<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/MU" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is &#8220;Motion Capture&#8221; Animation?</title>
	<link>http://megamoze.animationblogspot.com/2007/02/08/is-motion-capture-animation/</link>
	<description>My personal site for discussing animation and showing off my work.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 04:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: megamoze</title>
		<link>http://megamoze.animationblogspot.com/2007/02/08/is-motion-capture-animation/#comment-18</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 18:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://megamoze.animationblogspot.com/2007/02/08/is-motion-capture-animation/#comment-18</guid>
					<description>Animation simply means giving life to something.  At the Disney theme parks they refer to their costumed characters as animation.  Puppets are animation.  I don't see any reason to exclude mo-cap.  It's not &quot;key frame&quot; animation for sure, and one can argue the artistry involved (just as many railed against the early days of CGI).  But I think it's animation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Animation simply means giving life to something.  At the Disney theme parks they refer to their costumed characters as animation.  Puppets are animation.  I don&#8217;t see any reason to exclude mo-cap.  It&#8217;s not &#8220;key frame&#8221; animation for sure, and one can argue the artistry involved (just as many railed against the early days of CGI).  But I think it&#8217;s animation.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: yen3d</title>
		<link>http://megamoze.animationblogspot.com/2007/02/08/is-motion-capture-animation/#comment-17</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://megamoze.animationblogspot.com/2007/02/08/is-motion-capture-animation/#comment-17</guid>
					<description>I don't see mo-cap as animation.
It is just like filming something and putting an image filter on top of it.
I respect mo-cap films but, I don't think is fair to call them animated features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see mo-cap as animation.<br />
It is just like filming something and putting an image filter on top of it.<br />
I respect mo-cap films but, I don&#8217;t think is fair to call them animated features.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: megamoze</title>
		<link>http://megamoze.animationblogspot.com/2007/02/08/is-motion-capture-animation/#comment-6</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 06:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://megamoze.animationblogspot.com/2007/02/08/is-motion-capture-animation/#comment-6</guid>
					<description>Thanks for the comments!  I hope to generate some interesting debate about our art form here and in the AWN forums.

I have to disagree about the voice-acting, though.  Aside from the fact that I think Buzz Lightyear and Woody puh-lenty of soul and character, I think the voice-recording in Monster House was some of the most lifelike and convincing I've ever seen (or heard) in an animated film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments!  I hope to generate some interesting debate about our art form here and in the AWN forums.</p>
<p>I have to disagree about the voice-acting, though.  Aside from the fact that I think Buzz Lightyear and Woody puh-lenty of soul and character, I think the voice-recording in Monster House was some of the most lifelike and convincing I&#8217;ve ever seen (or heard) in an animated film.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: adelekthomas</title>
		<link>http://megamoze.animationblogspot.com/2007/02/08/is-motion-capture-animation/#comment-3</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 06:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://megamoze.animationblogspot.com/2007/02/08/is-motion-capture-animation/#comment-3</guid>
					<description>yes, it technically is animation. but because its so computer 'technical', it seems like a cheat...i just cant accept it as 'animation' ...its a personal thing really. I think you could get just the same animation, even more beautiful with a pencil. yet, what isnt animated without a computer these days? I do think that the motion capture should not be done by well known actors though, same as voice work...because having a famous name to a voice or movement takes away the soul of the character which the character and story artists have developed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, it technically is animation. but because its so computer &#8216;technical&#8217;, it seems like a cheat&#8230;i just cant accept it as &#8216;animation&#8217; &#8230;its a personal thing really. I think you could get just the same animation, even more beautiful with a pencil. yet, what isnt animated without a computer these days? I do think that the motion capture should not be done by well known actors though, same as voice work&#8230;because having a famous name to a voice or movement takes away the soul of the character which the character and story artists have developed.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
